The beast squeals louder, when it knows it is about to die by Christos Mouzeviris

As feared and expected, the great peace-making US President Donald Trump, the one who aspired to receive a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to achieve world peace, has started a war in Iran.

It was sadly obvious to many, that it wouldn't take long for a US-Iran war after the recent developments in the country and the ongoing threats by Mr Trump, about an iminent response to the country's recent demonstrations and strikes. We just hoped that reason would prevail; obviously not in US politics.

Naturally this conflict was brewing for much longer, not only between the US and Iran, but in Israel too. The Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted recently after the killing of Iran's former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, that he has a long-held desire- a 40 year long one, to deliver a decisive blow to the Iranian "regime". He emphasised the importance of military action for Israel's future, citing unprecedented support from the United States, which for some reason always seem to hop on one leg for their protectorate (or is it vice-versa?). It is also well known that the US and many of its allies in the region, notably Saudi Arabia, always saw Iran as a threat and an adversary to their own interests.

Therefore the two close allies, started bombarding Iran on February 28th 2026, dragging the rest of the world in a most perilous situation. For us Europeans it means that now we won't just have to pay billions of our tax payers money to support the war in Ukraine, which was caused by decades long mistakes of US and European foreign policy towards Russia. Never mind the fact that we were forced to accept millions of war refugees from Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, Bosnia, Somalia and Afghanistan over the past few decades- all result of US military interventions, straining our economies and social cohesion, with the Far Right gaining power everywhere as result.

The same situation will be something that we surely must be prepared to repeat pretty soon again, as the whole region of Middle East is in flames because of Israel's and US interests, or shall we say rampant nationalistic and ego delirium. In addition we must also face the consequence of higher costs of everything, as the price of oil has since the beginning of this war skyrocketed by 20%, with no end in sight.

However for the region of the Middle East, things can't be more dangerous right now. Israel is bombarding Iran but also Lebanon, in order to punish and destroy Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shia Islamist political party and paramilitary group, known for its military and political influence in Lebanon and its close ties to Iran.

In other words, the leadership of both USA and Israel, are tearing up any international laws that exist, in order to achieve their long dreamed goals of US and Israel hegemony in the region, by eliminating any opposing forces. To make sure that no one objects to their plans, they have long accused Iran of human rights violations-of women for example, by the cruel Islamist theocratic "regime" of Iran. But if they took it upon themselves to fix all evils in this world, something that no one has asked them to do, why they do not bomb Saudi Arabia too, for their oppressive theocratic regime, which is in fact worse that the one in Iran? Selective justice we promote, don't we?

Consequently, missiles are currently flying at any direction, as Iran in order to retaliate against its aggressors and avenge the death of many its political and religious leaders- like Ali Khamenei, has its missiles and drones hitting Israeli and US military targets in most Gulf and Levant states since the war broke out, plus Cyprus and Azerbaijan.

They are all sadly coming to terms of their pro-US policies and close relations choices. When you allow military bases of a foreign power, in order to gain protection, favour, money or influence, there will be a day when this foreign power engages in a conflict, that you will also have to pay the price. You are making yourself a target of whoever this country that "protects" you, is fighting against. Somehow USA and Israel have managed to establish military bases all over the Middle East, encircling Iran, yet it was always Iran that was the problem and the aggressor.

Lest we forget, that it was USA under Trump that withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, and now they are blaming the Iranians for their aspirations to develop nuclear weapons! Haven't we heard this excuse before? Besides, who decides who gets to have them after all? You see the Americans are a nation that has leaders suffering from megalomania, and think that every country in the world must abide by their wishes and vision for their region, either it is in their interests or not; as long as it serves the 1% of the American and Western elites.

Thus currently we have a raging war in the Middle East, something that costs way too much the US tax payers as Iran has damaged and destroyed 11 US military bases, with a total cost of destroyed American military equipment approached $2 billion, that of course someone will have to pay it one way or another, and it won't be only the American tax payers in the end.

But to make things even more dangerous and worse, it is reported that both Russia and China are assisting Iran in this conflict. Russia in particular is returning the US attitide in the Ukraine war towards Russia, as it is providing intelligence to Iran about U.S. positions, helping them strike considerable damage to US troops.

In other words, not only the US, Israel and Iran are involved in this conflict, but most of the Middle East, plus Russia and China, albeit more cautiously. This can escalate even worse, to a full on War World 3, since the conflicts around the globe do not stop and they keep sprouting like mushrooms everywhere. Naturally this is deliberate and there is a reason for it.

Iran has become a member of BRICS since 2024,an organization created by Russia and China, with the goal of counter balancing US and Western hegemony in the world. The block is for sometime now one of the driving forces behind the world's de-dollarisation efforts and that of course brings them in direct collision with vested US financial and political interests. The US clearly cannot go to into direct war with either Russia and China, as they are both nuclear powers and that will mean a total destruction of the world as we know it. Yet they are getting there slowly.

They use proxies, like Ukraine and now Iran, in order to bully their adversaries into submission. They disregarded all international and humanitarian law in Venezuela, a country aspiring to join BRICS too, regardless of the hurdles it faced by other members of the block. All of them are oil rich nations, and in oil the US economy and world dominance relies upon, together with the use of dollar worldwide as a reserve currency. Take these two together away from US control and you get the picture why America is so pissed with the world ganging up against it and revolting towards its hegemony in recent years.

They are itching against China over Taiwan, against Russia for decades now, North Korea and currently Iran. They are menacing all nations to comply with their interests or else and they even threatened and applied sanctions against their own allies, like U.K, Canada and the EU. They were fixated under Trump to take Greenland, a Danish overseas territory and an allied nation of the US, and the America President is now threatening to attack and interfere with Cuba once again after "he finishes with Iran"!

That is an evident sign that the US is preparing for an all out war, but they do not dare yet to go ahead with it... for now! And what is Europe doing to prepare itself for it or try to avert it? Has it tried to negotiate with or condemn America for its actions, which will affect the already badly affected European economy from the Ukraine war that we are forced to pay? Will it push for Israel and USA to be kicked out of sports and arts festivals and events, like they did when Russia invaded Ukraine? Will we even hit USA and Israel with 20 rounds of sanctions like we did to Russia in an effort to make them stop, or will we perhaps condemn the killing of 175 people, mostly young girls in an Iranian school recently, even when there are mounting evidence that the US was behind this war crime and attrocity? It is highly unlikely.

So far, only Spain out of all EU nations, dared to defy America and say "No to War"! In his familiar bullying style of course, The US president already threatened a trade war against Spain, after being refused the use of Spanish bases for his war with Iran, by the country's PM Pedro Sanchez. But Spain won't budge. Good on them! They obviously remember the consequences they had to suffer, after they agreed to join America in their Iraq war, and the humiliation they endured when it all turned out to be a fiasco of fabricated lies.

As can one clearly see, the US with the help of its protectorate states across the globe, is trying desperately to hold on to what it knows it is about to lose; its hegemony and economic dominance upon the rest of this world. It disregards entirely international laws, which obviously must apply only on its enemies like Russia, but never upon themselves; they are simply above them. They do not care how many people get killed in the process, the desolation they will cause in entire countries and regions for generations to come, the aftermatch and who will have to deal with or be affected by their actions, just as Europe must be prepared for another refugee influx pretty soon.

In Greece we have a saying; "The beast squeals louder, when it knows it is about to die". And that is exactly what we observe happening in the world right now. American and Western elites are exposed since the Epstein files scandal broke out, developing countries are getting organized and speeding up their efforts to counterbalance Western and US hegemony, money is running out due to all the previous wars and corruption scandals, oil is becoming scarce in some areas and there is the need to find new affordable sources. Thus, all states that stand in the way and do not comply or dare to raise their voice and defend their interests are being targeted, excluded, smeared and ultimately attacked.

The world is changing and the old ways that existed since the last wars (WW2), are fading away. The status quo is shifting and new powers emerge, leaving the West-both USA and Europe, scrumbling for importance and relevance. In their desperation to achieve this, they will squeal, cry, threaten, fight, claw and bare their teeth to any new challengers and threats that may face, just as a beast which feels that is fighting its last stand to survival. The problem is for us Europeans though, that America is escalating all its efforts to achieve its goals and they are not afraid to sacrifice our continent to their cause. So what are we going to do about it, are we going to support them to our own detriment and downfall, or will we unite behind Spain, re-engage with Russia and China and all the emerging economies and powers, in order to assert ourselves against US interests?

Our elites' choices will define Europe in the new era and world order, but for now, let's all hope that WW3 will be averted for the benefit of all humanity.

First Published in The Eblana European Democratic Movement


Luxury turned liability by Marja Heikkinen

For years, Dubai has carefully crafted an image that borders on the surreal, a glittering oasis where the wealthy sip cocktails in rooftop pools, influencers photograph golden sunsets over the desert and millionaires retire among marble towers and climate-controlled malls. It is a city that sells the promise of immunity from the world’s chaos. But recent events have delivered an uncomfortable truth. Even the most polished illusion cannot shield a place from the consequences of war.

The latest escalation in the confrontation surrounding Iran has sent tremors through the Gulf. For many observers, the focus immediately turns to missiles, military strategy and oil markets. Yet another consequence is emerging quietly but powerfully: the realization that being a tourist, a celebrity or a wealthy retiree enjoying Dubai’s famous luxury lifestyle can suddenly become risky.

That shift in perception may prove to be one of the most damaging long-term effects of the conflict. Dubai’s success has always depended on something fragile: confidence. Confidence that it is stable. Confidence that it is safe. Confidence that global elites can live there insulated from the geopolitical storms that swirl around the Middle East. Unlike traditional economic centers built on industry or manufacturing, Dubai’s economy thrives on mobility, travellers, investors, expatriates and visitors who come because they believe the city offers security wrapped in extravagance.

But war changes how people think about geography. Missile ranges do not respect the carefully curated marketing brochures of luxury destinations. Neither do regional tensions pause politely at the edge of a skyline filled with five-star hotels. When military conflict looms in the Gulf, the psychological distance between Tehran, Riyadh and Dubai suddenly shrinks in the minds of outsiders who once viewed the city as a separate universe.

That perception matters. For the retiree from Europe who bought a penthouse overlooking the Persian Gulf, the question now becomes unavoidable: what happens if tensions escalate further? For the influencer who built a brand around Dubai’s endless sunshine and luxury shopping, the thought of air-raid sirens interrupts the narrative. Even the billionaire investor, accustomed to risk in financial markets, may reconsider risk when it involves the possibility of regional conflict.

Dubai’s remarkable rise over the past three decades was built on the idea that it could function as a global crossroads untouched by the region’s instability. The formula worked brilliantly. Airlines connected the world through its airports. Wealth poured into its real estate. Celebrities treated it as a glamorous playground between Europe and Asia.

But geopolitics has a way of intruding on carefully constructed fantasies. The truth is that Dubai never existed outside the Middle East’s strategic tensions. It simply benefited from a period in which those tensions remained contained. Now, with a confrontation involving Iran threatening to expand, the illusion of distance is fading.

And perception, more than reality, is what drives the decisions of travellers and investors. No missile needs to land in downtown Dubai to create economic consequences. The mere possibility can shift travel plans, slow property purchases and redirect global attention elsewhere. Luxury tourism, after all, depends on comfort and comfort evaporates quickly when headlines mention war.

Dubai will likely endure. The city has proven remarkably resilient before. Yet the psychological damage could linger longer than the immediate crisis. Because once people begin to realize that paradise sits within range of geopolitics, the dream becomes harder to sell.


#eBook Compounding Threats by Brea Willis

 

For decades, the discourse on climate change has been framed as an environmental concern, a matter of conservation, emissions targets, and scientific modeling. While not incorrect, this framing is dangerously incomplete.

To understand the full gravity of our predicament, we must shift our lens, climate change is the paramount “threat multiplier” of our age, fundamentally redefining the landscape of national and global security. This book moves beyond polar bears and melting ice to examine how rising temperatures are actively dismantling stability, amplifying existing fractures, and creating new, unanticipated vectors of conflict.

Climate change and national security in the 21st century

Brea Willis is a botanical phantom. For three decades, she’s moved between the canopies of the Amazon and the halls of academia, her skin weathered by sun and her eyes sharp with knowing. A lifelong activist, she now lives off-grid, trading scientific papers for quiet rewilding, her radical hope planted firmly in the soil.

Ovi eBook Publishing 2026

Compounding Threats

Read it online or download HERE!
Read it online & downloading it as PDF or EPUB HERE!
Or enjoy reading it online & downloading it as PDF HERE!
All downloads are FREE!


For more eBooks check Ovi eBookshelves HERE!

Ma-Siri & Co #119 #Cartoon by Thanos Kalamidas

 

Ma-Siri is a mother, a grandmother and a very active social life,
searching for the meaning of life among other things and her glasses.

For more Ma-Siri & Alexa, HERE!
For more Ovi Cartoons, HERE!


Robert Muller The U.N. Networker by Rene Wadlow

Decide to Network, use every letter you write, every conversation you have,
every meeting you attend to express your fundamental beliefs and dreams,
affirm to others the vision of the world you want. 
In a world of big powers,  big media and monopolies, networking is a new freedom,
the new democracy, a new form of happiness.
Robert Muller

Robert Muller, whose birth anniversary we mark on 11 March,  devoted his life to the ideals of the United Nations, working both within the organization in which he became Assistant Secretary-General and in his talks and activities with many associations and conferences.  As he wrote, his guideline was the pledge which all U.N. Secretariat members must sign when joining: " I, Robert Muller, solemnly swear to exercise in all loyalty, discretion and conscience the functions entrusted to me as an international civil servant of the United Nations, to discharge these functions and to regulate my conduct with the interests of the United Nations only in view, and not to seek or accept instructions in regard to the performance of my duties from any government or other authority external to the organization."

Muller joined the United Nations in 1948 with a doctorate in economics.  Most of his U.N. work was related to socio-economic development in the States born with the end of Western European colonialism.  As he wrote, "The human adventure on earth is taking world-wide proportions.  We must be bracing ourselves for the staggering problems that lie ahead, and it is fortunate that we possess world-wide instruments at the precise moment of history and evolution when the human species enters its global age.  Humanity is equipping itself slowly but surely with collective analytical tools, world-wide warning systems, and a network of feedbacks and monitoring.  In other words - a kind of brain and nervous system... The United Nations has become a kind of incipient brain for the human species as a whole.  It has taken stock of our planetary home and of our species, so that now we have a good inventory of our present as well as valuable appraisals of our potential futures... If something begins to go wrong on the global level, the United Nations can give a warning.".  

Robert Muller was particularly active in the preparation and follow up of a series of stocktaking U.N. conferences held especially in the 1970s:

1)  World Conference on the Environment - Stockholm - 1972
2)  World Food Conference - Rome -1974
3)  World Conference on Population - Bucharest -1974
4)  World Conference on Women - Mexico City - 1975
5)  World Conference on Employment and Basic Needs - Geneva -1976
6)  World Conference on Human Settlements - Vancouver - 1976
7)  World Water Conference - Mar del Blata -1977
8)  World Conference on Desertification - Nairobi - 1977
9) World Conference on Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries - Buenos Aires - 1978
10)  World Conference on Land Reform - Rome - 1979
11) World Conference on Science and Technology - Vienna -1979

The 1970 Decade ended with the International Year of  the Child.  The Decade had also seen from 1974 to 1981 the World Conference on the Law of the Sea.

As Muller wrote "We must believe in peace, human ascent and justice.  As for all things on this Earth, a period of preparation, of takeoff is needed.  This is typically the case for economic development, and the same is true of peace, disarmament, and worldwide cooperation.  The beginnings are slow, but suddenly a progress which seemed so difficult, nay impossible, begins to accelerate and to gain momentum... Therefore we must think and act years ahead.  We must begin to manage our resources, our actions, behavior and interventions in a new fashion, taking into account the new world-wide dimensions and long-term effects which are being imposed on us with an iron fist by our own discoveries, intelligence and drives ahead." 

Muller understood clearly that the U.N. Secretariat had a great deal of information arising from these conferences and from U.N. field workers.  However, it remained the task of the Member States to use this information to guide their policies.  Yet national governments usually did not act on the information.  There were very few, if any, follow ups to the U.N. conferences.  U.N. Reports and studies had very limited readership.  Later, Muller suggested that "The United Nations and its agencies should transform their mere information activities into active public relations and communications reaching the grass-roots level of society.  Consideration should be given to the creation of a UN Planetary Information and Public Relations Agency."

Although no such U.N. public relations agency was created, Muller was an active U.N. networker reaching out through talks and publications, especially to religious groups and schools.  On retirement, he bought a home in Costa Rica to be near the U.N.-created University for Peace, whose aim was to train world-minded socio-economic activists.  Robert Muller also became the Honorary President of the Association of World Citizens.  He was a model of perseverance, work, faith and imagination.

His concern on how the knowledge contained within the U.N. system can be shared with a wide public in an action-oriented language remains a key issue.  Too many U.N. documents are writtten in UNese, edited to offend no Member State nor to present ideas which might be disputed.  Consensus-building styles of writing are not very exciting.  Networking is stilla priority need.

 ********************************

Note: Also from Rene Wadlow in Ovi magazine: Robert Muller: Crossing Frontiers for Reconciliation,

 ********************************

Rene Wadlow, President, Association of World Citizens


Predator’s foreign policy by Emma Schneider

In Washington presidents often cloak their ambitions in the language of freedom, stability and national security. But sometimes the rhetoric slips, revealing something far more primal beneath it. In the case of Donald Trump’s foreign policy, especially in places like Venezuela and Iran, the mask barely holds. What emerges is not strategy rooted in diplomacy or humanitarian concern but the unmistakable logic of imperial appetite.

Again and again, Trump frames international crises not as human tragedies but as opportunities. Oil fields become “assets.” Governments become obstacles to be removed. Entire nations are reduced to chess pieces in a contest for power and resources. It is the worldview of a corporate raider projected onto global politics.

Look at Venezuela. In recent months, Washington has deepened its involvement in the country’s political and economic turmoil, while American officials openly discuss the restructuring of Venezuela’s oil and mineral sectors. The United States has already moved to assert influence over key resources and industries, including gold mining and petroleum infrastructure.

Supporters argue that these actions are about restoring democracy or countering geopolitical rivals. But the optics and the language tell a different story. When foreign policy revolves around who controls the oil, the gold and the pipelines, it begins to look less like liberation and more like acquisition.

The pattern extends far beyond Latin America. Trump’s confrontational approach to Iran follows a similar script, maximum pressure, economic strangulation and now direct military escalation. Intelligence analysts themselves warn that even massive military force is unlikely to topple Iran’s entrenched leadership.

Yet the administration continues to speak in sweeping terms about reshaping the Middle East, forcing surrender and remaking regimes. It’s a familiar imperial fantasy, the belief that overwhelming power can bend complex societies to Washington’s will.

What gets lost in this muscular rhetoric are the people who live inside these geopolitical experiments.

Economic sanctions aimed at governments rarely stay neatly confined to political elites. They ripple outward, landing hardest on ordinary citizens: families struggling with shortages, patients cut off from medicine, workers watching their economies collapse. In Iran, years of sanctions have contributed to severe economic hardship for civilians, even when humanitarian exemptions technically exist.

But human consequences rarely feature in Trump’s speeches. Instead, his worldview divides the planet into winners and losers, allies and adversaries, assets and obstacles. It is the language of dominance, not stewardship.

History should make Americans wary of this mindset. The United States has spent decades trying and failing to engineer political outcomes abroad through coercion. From Iraq to Afghanistan to countless smaller interventions, the lesson has been painfully consistent, power can destroy regimes but it cannot easily build stable societies.

Trump appears uninterested in that lesson. His instinct is not caution but escalation, not cooperation but confrontation. The world becomes a marketplace of leverage, where strength is measured by how forcefully America can impose its will.

There is a name for that approach. It is not diplomacy. It is not even traditional realism. It is imperialism dressed in modern clothing, transactional, extractive and indifferent to the lives caught in its path. And like every imperial project before it, it risks leaving devastation long after the headlines fade.


The quiet intelligence beneath the waves by Ilyas Wilkins

It is tempting, when staring at the long arc of evolution, to assume that humanity sits at its summit, the inevitable crown of Earth’s experiment with intelligence. But evolution has no summit, no final exam. It simply keeps trying things. And if there is a candidate quietly waiting in the wings for the planet’s next great act of intelligence, it might not walk on two legs at all. It might have eight.

The octopus has always been the ocean’s great eccentric. A creature with no bones, three hearts, blue blood, and a nervous system that seems to have been designed by a surrealist engineer. Roughly two-thirds of its neurons aren’t even in its brain but distributed through its arms, which can taste, touch, and explore almost independently. Each limb is a semi-autonomous investigator, gathering information about the world. Imagine if your hands could think for themselves.

Scientists often describe octopus intelligence with a mix of admiration and bewilderment. They solve puzzles. They escape aquariums. They open jars. Some appear to recognize individual humans. There are documented cases of octopuses deliberately squirting water at specific researchers they seem to dislike. This is not the dull reflex of a simple animal. It is something closer to personality.

Yet the most fascinating thing about octopus intelligence is how alien it feels. Human intelligence evolved along a social path, language, cooperation, culture. Octopuses on the other hand are largely solitary. They do not build cities or tribes. Their brilliance blooms in isolation, a private genius in a tide pool.

And that raises a strange question: what would intelligence look like if it evolved again from a completely different starting point?

Octopuses already possess several qualities that evolution tends to favor in complex thinkers: problem-solving ability, adaptable bodies, sensitive perception, and remarkable camouflage that allows them to interact dynamically with their surroundings. Their skin can change color and texture instantly, effectively turning their entire body into a display screen. It is a language of light and pattern we barely understand.

Of course, octopuses have one enormous evolutionary disadvantage. They die young. Most live only one to three years, which leaves little time for the accumulation of knowledge across generations. Human civilization exists largely because our species can learn slowly and pass information forward. An octopus society, if such a thing ever emerged, would require longer lives or some other method of storing knowledge outside the body.

Still, evolution is patient in ways humans struggle to imagine. The ancestors of mammals scurried in the shadows for tens of millions of years before getting their moment.

Picture Earth a few million years after humans are gone, whether through climate collapse, asteroid or the slow exhaustion of our own ambitions. The oceans remain, vast and ancient. In the reefs and rocky shelves, octopus descendants continue experimenting with intelligence, generation after generation.

Perhaps they grow slightly longer-lived. Perhaps they become more social. Perhaps they begin leaving marks or arranging objects in ways that persist beyond a single lifespan.

It may sound fanciful, but so would the idea of skyscrapers and satellites to a reptile living two hundred million years ago.

Evolution does not repeat itself exactly. But it does keep looking for new minds.

And somewhere beneath the waves, eight arms are already thinking.


The price of uncertainty by Zakir Hall

American stock markets, that barometer of confidence and greed, took a subtle hit this week, not catastrophic but enough to rattle the nerves of investors accustomed to short-term gains and long-term illusions of stability. The cause? A looming prospect that the current conflict overseas could stretch on indefinitely, offering no clear resolution in sight. The markets, like most humans, despise uncertainty. And yet, this is the kind of uncertainty that cannot be hedged away with options, futures, or glossy corporate earnings reports.

We are living in a moment where the market’s fickle temperament meets the sobering reality of war. A few points lost on the Dow or Nasdaq barely scratches the surface of the true cost. Investors glance nervously at portfolios, economists offer cautious optimism and pundits debate whether this is a “buy-the-dip” moment or a signal of worse to come. But let’s be honest: these metrics are only half the story. Stocks fluctuate, indices rise and fall, but the human toll, the one that truly matters, is measured in lives, not in dollars.

The markets are already signaling anxiety, and for good reason. Every day the war continues without a horizon of resolution, the stakes escalate, not just abroad, but here at home. Supply chains tremble, fuel costs rise, and uncertainty seeps into corporate boardrooms where decisions that affect millions are made. There is a creeping awareness that no portfolio, however diversified, can escape the ripple effects of a prolonged conflict. Investors know this intuitively; they just hope the damage can remain abstract, confined to spreadsheets and quarterly reports.

Yet there is a harsher truth that cannot be ignored, the situation will grow far grimmer if “body bags” start arriving. Markets can tolerate abstract risk, but human mortality is an unchangeable event. Once the war touches the doorsteps of families across America, not just in faraway lands but through sons, daughters and neighbors, the illusion of distance evaporates. Then, and only then, will the superficial tremors of the stock market transform into a full-blown reckoning. The human cost cannot be translated into market cap, and any attempt to do so is morally bankrupt.

It’s tempting to view the current dip as a technical hiccup, an opportunity to buy low before the eventual recovery. But framing war in terms of opportunity is precisely the type of thinking that allows nations and markets alike to grow numb to tragedy. True resilience isn’t measured by quarterly earnings or a rebound in investor confidence; it’s measured by our ability to reckon with the consequences of decisions that send people into harm’s way.

American markets will survive. They always do, finding new peaks, new instruments, new ways to extract profit from chaos. But the moral calculus is far more stubborn. Investors can recover; the families of fallen soldiers cannot. And as long as conflict drags on without clarity or end, both markets and society are left to wander in that uncomfortable gray space between the financial and the human, between speculation and reality.

Markets are fickle. Life is not. And sometimes, the prices we pay for uncertainty are too high to ever appear on a balance sheet.


Ian Glim #005 #cartoon by Thanos Kalamidas

 

A bewildered soul navigating global complexities armed
only with earnestness and a sharp, sarcastic wit.

For more Ian Glim, HERE!
For more Ovi Cartoons, HERE!


The first crack in the mirror by Markus Gibbons

In Washington, scandals rarely arrive with the dramatic clarity of a thunderclap. They seep in slowly, like water through old stone, until one morning the public notices the wall has begun to crack. The current moment surrounding Kristi Noem feels suspiciously like that first fracture.

For months, critics have whispered about the ethical fog that seems to follow Noem wherever she governs. Travel questions, donor relationships, the curious blending of public office and personal promotion all hover around her political orbit. None alone appears catastrophic but together they form the unmistakable outline of something larger: the quiet normalization of behavior that once would have ended a career.

What makes this moment different is not merely the allegations themselves but the political climate that has allowed them to breathe. We are living through an era in which ethical gravity often feels suspended. The administration currently occupying Washington has turned scandal into background noise, a constant hum beneath the machinery of government. In such an environment, accountability begins to look almost antique.

Yet history suggests that systems built on brazenness eventually trip over their own confidence. The first figure to face real consequences is rarely the most powerful. Instead, it is often a prominent loyalist, someone visible enough to satisfy public outrage yet expendable enough to protect the larger structure. If the investigations circling Noem deepen, she could easily become that symbolic first reckoning.

This possibility explains the nervous choreography now visible among allies who once defended her without hesitation. Watch closely and you can see the subtle repositioning: statements that sound supportive but oddly conditional, praise followed by long pauses. Washington is fluent in the language of distance. When politicians begin speaking in careful half sentences, it usually means they are already measuring the door.

None of this proves guilt, and responsible observers should resist the temptation to declare verdicts before investigators finish their work. But journalism has another duty, to notice patterns of power and privilege before they harden into precedent. When public officials appear to treat government as a stage for personal brand building, skepticism is not cynicism. It is civic hygiene.

If Kristi Noem’s controversies ultimately fade, Washington will return to its familiar rhythm of shrugging endurance. But if they sharpen into genuine accountability, the episode may mark something more significant: the first visible crack in a political culture that has grown far too comfortable flirting with corruption. And once a crack appears, the public tends to look more closely at the entire wall.

The danger for any administration that tolerates ethical shortcuts is not merely legal exposure but narrative collapse. Voters are surprisingly patient with power, yet they are ruthless when a story suddenly makes sense. The moment citizens begin connecting scattered episodes into a single pattern, the political weather changes quickly. What once looked like partisan sniping starts to resemble documentation. What once sounded like rumor begins to echo like warning.

And so the question lingering over Noem is larger than one politician’s fate. It is whether the country has reached the point where fatigue with corruption finally outweighs the habit of tolerating it. If that shift arrives, the first consequence will not be subtle. It will be unmistakable, public, and politically contagious, the sort of reckoning that reminds Washington that impunity is never permanent. Ever.


Architectural Ballet #Poem & #Painting by Nikos Laios

 

Those nights spent walking
The streets of this metropolis
On an architectural journey,
Reading the poetry of this
City through its buildings

And structures alive with the
Pulsating beat of humanity,
And I walked through the
Alleyways threading
The glass and steel towers,
The music of Gershwin’s
‘Rhapsody in Blue’
Played in my head,
And the lights of the
City illuminated the night
Suspended in their air,
An architectural ballet.

 *******************************
With a digital painting from Nikos Laios

 *******************************
Check Nikos Laios' eBOOK, HERE!

The beast squeals louder, when it knows it is about to die by Christos Mouzeviris

As feared and expected, the great peace-making US President Donald Trump, the one who aspired to receive a Nobel Peace Prize for his effort...