Argentine politics has never lacked drama, but this week’s provincial election results delivered a sharp slap across the face of President Javier Milei and his young libertarian experiment. In Buenos Aires province, the country’s largest and most politically decisive district, the opposition Peronists secured 47% of the vote, while Milei’s La Libertad Avanza limped behind with just 34%. Milei, in an unusually sober moment, admitted his party’s “clear defeat.” He promised to accept, process, and correct his “political mistakes” but insisted he would not back down from his reform agenda “one millimeter.”
The problem is not a matter of inches or millimeters. The problem is that Javier Milei is the president of Argentina at all.
For nearly a year, Milei has governed like a man who mistook a television studio for the Casa Rosada. His campaign persona, the roaring libertarian lion who promised to chainsaw the state into oblivion, may have thrilled disenchanted voters tired of inflation, corruption, and decades of stagnant politics. But governing a nation of forty-five million people requires more than shouting about freedom and waving a chainsaw onstage. It requires coalition-building, discipline, and at least some grasp of reality. Milei has shown little of any of these.
His enemies are not only the entrenched Peronist machine, though that alone would be a formidable obstacle. His enemies are also the facts on the ground. Inflation continues to batter families, wages remain insufficient, and the cost of living spirals beyond comprehension. Milei’s answer is always the same: “more market, less state.” But that mantra, repeated like scripture, does little to calm a mother trying to feed her children when prices double in months. Argentina’s economic crisis is real, and Milei’s economic theories, borrowed from textbooks and libertarian podcasts, are not enough.
Worse still, Milei governs as though his mandate were absolute, when in reality his party never commanded more than a minority. He was elected president, yes, but he has no legislative majority, no provincial governors in his corner, and no durable coalition beyond a circle of loyal ideologues. Governing Argentina requires compromise, not tantrums. Yet Milei seems incapable of distinguishing between the two. His defeats in Congress have been numerous, his decrees challenged in courts, and his reforms slowed to a crawl. The election results in Buenos Aires province merely confirm what was already obvious: Milei is a lion who roars loudly but cannot bite.
Still, the spectacle has been captivating. He insults foreign leaders one day, threatens the local media the next, and accuses his opponents of plotting communist conspiracies from the shadows. He treats politics as combat, a zero-sum game in which every critic is an enemy of liberty. This strategy may energize a narrow base of diehards, but it alienates the majority of Argentines who want solutions, not theatrics. People can endure eccentricity from a comedian or a shock jock. From a president, eccentricity without results quickly turns into farce.
The Buenos Aires defeat should be Milei’s moment of reckoning. The province represents nearly 40% of Argentina’s voters and has long been the crucible of national power. To lose so decisively there is not simply a stumble; it is an earthquake that shakes the legitimacy of his project. Milei acknowledged mistakes, but the question is whether he truly understands them. The mistake is not that his speeches were too fiery or his strategy insufficiently cunning. The mistake is more profound: Argentina entrusted its highest office to a man who confuses ideology with governance, slogans with policy, and enemies with citizens.
The tragedy is that Argentina did not arrive here by accident. Milei’s rise was fueled by anger at decades of broken promises from Peronists and conservatives alike. Corruption scandals, inflationary spirals, and political dynasties treating the nation as their inheritance paved the way for an outsider who claimed he would smash the whole rotten system. That anger was justified. But Argentina leapt from one disaster into another, mistaking fury for vision. Milei is less a solution than a symptom of a deeper democratic fatigue.
Now, Argentina faces the consequences. The Peronists, with their long history of populism and patronage, are ascendant again. Milei, for all his thunder, has weakened his own credibility and inadvertently revived the very forces he promised to bury. If he continues down this path, isolated, stubborn, and convinced of his own prophetic genius, his presidency may end not with reform but with irrelevance. And Argentines, once again, will be left paying the price of political theater.
What Argentina needs is not a showman, not a chainsaw, not another messianic figure promising salvation. It needs a leader willing to do the hard, unglamorous work of building consensus, stabilizing the economy, and restoring trust in institutions. That leader is not Javier Milei. He was always a protest vote in presidential clothing, a symbol of rage mistaken for a program of change. The longer he clings to power with the same dogmatic fervor, the clearer it becomes: Argentina’s biggest political mistake is not his policies, nor his defeats, but his very presence in the presidential chair.
A lion without teeth can still roar, but eventually, the people stop listening. The Buenos Aires elections show that Argentines are already tuning out.
No comments:
Post a Comment