The fire that burned twice by Thanos Kalamidas

The assassination of Charlie Kirk sparked an immediate and predictable chorus among far-right commentators, columnists, politicians, and activists. Within hours, the comparisons began to flow: This is America’s Reichstag fire moment. The reference is meant to be dramatic, even prophetic. The story goes like this: in February 1933, after the Reichstag building in Berlin was set ablaze, Hitler seized the opportunity, declared a state of emergency, and suspended civil rights. The dictatorship of Nazi Germany cemented itself in that moment of fear and chaos. The implication from today’s chorus is clear; America is sliding down the same path.

But there is a dual irony embedded in their framing, one so glaring it’s almost comical. The first is historical. These voices assume that the Reichstag fire was some tragic accident, an event exploited by a clever politician in a moment of chance. What they fail to acknowledge or perhaps never learned, is that the fire itself was an inside job, a carefully planned provocation. Hermann Göring, Hitler’s second-in-command, orchestrated the event precisely to justify the suspension of rights and the crushing of opposition. The Reichstag fire wasn’t a random spark in the night. It was engineered, staged, a pretext dressed up as a crisis.

The second irony is more philosophical and more damning. By invoking the Reichstag fire, these commentators are not warning against dictatorship, they are unconsciously revealing their fantasy of it. They are playing with the imagery of emergency powers, suspended rights, and political purges as if those things are tools to be kept ready for deployment. They imagine themselves not as the victims of such a system, but as the beneficiaries.

It’s worth dwelling on what actually happened in Germany in 1933. The fire tore through the Reichstag building on February 27. The following day, the Reichstag Fire Decree was issued, formally suspending key civil liberties. Freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and the right to privacy in communications all vanished overnight. Opposition parties, particularly the Communists and Social Democrats, were arrested en masse. The machinery of a police state clicked into place, with legal cover. It was not a gradual slide but a sudden lurch. Within months, Germany was unrecognizable.

The lesson, if one is honest enough to look, is that dictatorship does not descend by accident. It is prepared, staged, provoked, and then excused. The Reichstag fire did not just happen to Hitler, it was created by him.

And here lies the uncomfortable twist. When today’s American right invokes this event, they do so as if they are the ones in danger of being silenced. They cast themselves as the innocent parties who will be swept away by tyranny in the wake of Kirk’s assassination. Yet history suggests that those most eager to cry “Reichstag!” are usually the ones tempted to light the match themselves.

This is why the invocation is so dangerous, and why it reveals more than its speakers intend. The subtext is not, “Beware, democracy is fragile.” The subtext is, “Perhaps this moment is useful.” What if chaos becomes an opportunity to clamp down, to suspend, to silence? After all, that is precisely what Hitler and Göring did.

The other irony they seem unable to grasp or wilfully ignore is how the story ends. The Nazi regime, born in the flames of the Reichstag, did not last a thousand years. It lasted twelve. It ended in rubble, in trials, in disgrace. Its leaders, once so certain of their control, were either hanged, imprisoned, or left to swallow cyanide in a bunker. The Reichstag fire was the opening act not of eternal dominance, but of catastrophic failure. To invoke it today is not just historically inaccurate, but historically suicidal.

If we take their analogy at face value, what they are saying is chilling. They are not warning against dictatorship, they are flirting with its blueprint. They imagine Kirk’s assassination as the spark. They imagine the emergency decree as the logical next step. They imagine themselves not in handcuffs but in uniforms. In other words, they see in the Reichstag fire a moment of power to be seized, not a warning to be heeded.

This is where the failure of education comes into play. For decades, American schooling has treated history as a collection of dates, names, and testable trivia. The deeper lessons, the manipulations, the provocations, the cynical engineering of crises, get lost. Many of those now blithely comparing Kirk’s death to the Reichstag fire simply do not understand what they are referencing. They see fire, emergency, dictatorship, and assume it’s a parable about government overreach. They never learned the more uncomfortable truth: that governments do not always respond to crisis, they sometimes manufacture it.

So here we are, watching a narrative unfold in real time. Kirk’s assassination was a tragedy. It was also, in political terms, a shockwave. How that shockwave is interpreted, weaponized, or distorted will shape what comes next. And right now, the loudest voices on the right are not calling for restraint. They are not calling for measured justice. They are calling for a myth, a Reichstag fire myth that absolves them of patience and grants them license for revenge.

That is the ultimate irony, the flame that burns twice. The Reichstag fire destroyed civil liberties in Germany. Its invocation today risks burning through what remains of America’s fragile democratic fabric. Those who shout the analogy the loudest may not realize that they are rehearsing not the role of victims, but of villains. They are revealing their own desire for emergency powers, for silenced opponents, for rule by decree.

History does not repeat itself neatly, but it does rhyme in cruel ways. The Reichstag fire should stand as a warning of how fragile liberty is in the face of engineered chaos. Instead, it has been reduced to a talking point for those who dream of wielding that chaos for themselves. The tragedy is not just that they fail to see the irony. The tragedy is that they may yet succeed in becoming its authors.


No comments:

The fire that burned twice by Thanos Kalamidas

The assassination of Charlie Kirk sparked an immediate and predictable chorus among far-right commentators, columnists, politicians, and ac...