JD Vance is not just a fascist fool; he is a dangerous fascist fool. The danger is not theatrical. It does not come from wild gestures or foaming-at-the-mouth speeches alone. It comes from the smoothness with which he wraps authoritarian instincts in the language of “common sense,” from the way he sells obedience as realism, and from how eagerly he has volunteered to become a political instrument for forces far larger, richer and more cynical than himself.
Vance markets his story as proof of independence, the poor kid made good; the hillbilly who cracked the code of elite America and returned as a translator for the forgotten. But independence is precisely what he abandoned. What we see now is not a rebel against power but a courier for it, repeating its talking points with the devotion of a convert who knows his place at the table is conditional.
His politics revolve around a single, corrosive idea: that democracy is expendable if it produces the “wrong” outcomes. He does not argue this bluntly, of course. He talks instead about “order,” about “cultural survival,” about the need to protect the nation from internal enemies who somehow always resemble journalists, professors, immigrants, activists, or anyone else insufficiently loyal to the approved script. It is the oldest authoritarian trick in the book, rebranding repression as self-defense.
There is something especially unsettling about how calmly he performs this role. Vance does not rant like a street demagogue. He smiles. He shrugs. He adopts the tone of a man explaining an inconvenient but necessary business decision: freedoms are nice, but stability is nicer; pluralism is charming, but obedience is more efficient. His version of fascism comes dressed as pragmatism, which makes it easier to swallow and far harder to uproot.
And then there is the question of who benefits. Vance’s ideological flexibility ends the moment money enters the room. He rails against “elites” while orbiting billionaires. He condemns corporate power in speeches while courting it in private. His politics are soaked in the language of populism but financed and amplified by people who would not recognize a real working-class struggle if it knocked on their gated doors.
Elon Musk looms largest among these figures, not merely as a donor or celebrity ally but as a symbol of the world Vance truly serves. Musk represents a new aristocracy, unaccountable, obscenely wealthy, technologically omnipresent, and openly contemptuous of democratic constraints. He treats public institutions as toys, laws as suggestions, and human beings as data points or disposable labor.
That Vance gravitates toward this orbit is not an accident. It is alignment. Both men share a belief that society is best run by a narrow class of “visionaries” whose wealth is mistaken for wisdom. Both are hostile to regulation, skeptical of democracy, and fascinated by strongman politics dressed up as innovation. Where Musk offers the machinery, platforms, algorithms, money, influence, Vance offers the ideology, a political doctrine that normalizes hierarchy, punishes dissent, and trains citizens to accept rule from above as inevitable.
In this arrangement, Vance is not the architect. He is the spokesperson. The reliable mouthpiece. The man who takes the raw interests of concentrated wealth and repackages them as moral necessity.
That is why he is more dangerous than the average political extremist. He does not look like a villain. He looks like a policy guy. He sounds reasonable. He frames cruelty as maturity and submission as patriotism. He invites people to believe that their shrinking freedoms are not theft, but trade-offs.
History shows how this works. Authoritarian systems rarely begin with jackboots. They begin with columnists and senators and “serious thinkers” who assure the public that harsh measures are regrettable but unavoidable. That enemies are everywhere. That compromise is weakness. That democracy is a luxury we can no longer afford.
Vance is auditioning for that role with enthusiasm. Calling him a fool is accurate, but incomplete. Fools can be ignored. Pawns cannot, because they move when powerful hands push them. Vance’s ambition is to be useful to those hands, to prove that he can translate oligarchic interests into laws, judgeships, and cultural permission slips for repression.
He is dangerous not because he is brilliant, but because he is obedient. Not because he leads, but because he sells the idea that being led, quietly, obediently, permanently, —is the natural order of things.
That is the real threat. Not the noise of extremism, but its normalization. Not the fringe, but the suit and tie. Not the billionaire in the spotlight, but the politician who kneels just out of frame and calls it patriotism.
No comments:
Post a Comment