There is something seriously damaging about a world that tells its young people to study hard, work harder, dream bigger and then hands them an invoice they cannot afford to pay. The modern economy has perfected a particularly obscene trick: it sells young people the promise of a future while quietly making that future unaffordable.
And now the young are beginning to return the merchandise. From Tirana to Paris to Buenos Aires, students are taking to the streets, confronting police and challenging governments that appear increasingly comfortable with a generation living permanently on the edge of financial exhaustion. These movements are not identical, and pretending they are one international revolution would be lazy analysis. But beneath their different demands lies a common question: what exactly is the point of following society's rules when society appears to have abandoned its side of the bargain?
In Albania, frustration over corruption, university conditions, employment prospects and a controversial luxury development has helped turn months of protest into a wider confrontation with the government. In France, students have challenged overcrowded classrooms, teacher shortages and deteriorating educational conditions. In Argentina, demonstrators have opposed cuts threatening public universities.
Different countries, different political systems, different immediate grievances. Yet the same generational impatience is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. Politicians keep explaining that economic reality is complicated. Of course it is. Budgets are finite, governments face difficult choices, and no responsible person believes that money grows on parliamentary benches. But economic realism cannot mean that ordinary people must accept permanent insecurity while those with money, connections and political influence continue to negotiate their own exemptions from hardship.
For young people, the mathematics has become brutally simple. Education costs money. Housing costs money. Transport costs money. Food costs money. Even the privilege of looking for a job can cost money. Meanwhile, a degree increasingly resembles an expensive lottery ticket whose prize is the opportunity to compete for work that may not pay enough to rent an apartment.
Then the same society lectures graduates about personal responsibility. Wonderful. Apparently, the young are responsible for their employability, their productivity, their retirement savings and their ability to survive an increasingly expensive world. Governments, meanwhile, are somehow not responsible when schools deteriorate, public services weaken, corruption flourishes or economic policies leave an entire generation wondering whether independence is becoming a luxury reserved for the wealthy.
The traditional political response is equally predictable. Protesters are immature. Their demands are unrealistic. They are manipulated by extremists. They should return to their classrooms, respect authority and wait patiently for the benefits of economic growth.
How long, exactly, should they wait? Until they are forty? Until their parents have retired and their children inherit the same problems? Until patience itself becomes a hereditary condition?
There is a particularly insulting hypocrisy in societies that celebrate youthful ambition while treating youthful labour as disposable. Employers demand experience from people who have not been given the opportunity to acquire it. Governments celebrate entrepreneurship while housing costs consume the savings needed to start a business. Politicians praise education while arguing over the resources required to provide it.
And then they express astonishment when students stop applauding. The danger is that legitimate anger can be hijacked, manipulated or consumed by violence. Burning buildings, attacking police officers and destroying local businesses do not automatically create a fairer society. Such actions can alienate potential supporters and leave ordinary workers paying for damage they had no part in causing. Governments have a responsibility to protect public safety, but they cannot use every broken window as an excuse to ignore every legitimate grievance.
Nor should they confuse silence with consent. The answer is not another glossy youth strategy, another ministerial photograph with carefully selected students or another promise that prosperity is just around the corner. It requires affordable housing, accessible education, decent wages, functioning public services, credible action against corruption and an economic model that does not assume young people can survive indefinitely on temporary contracts and parental assistance.
Most importantly, young citizens must be treated as participants in democracy rather than inconvenient customers complaining about a defective product. The subsistence generation is not necessarily demanding a revolution. Many are demanding something far less extravagant: a life in which working, studying and contributing to society can provide a reasonable chance of living with dignity.
If governments cannot understand that distinction, they should not be surprised when the streets become the only classrooms in which young people believe anybody is listening. The young are not rebelling because they have forgotten the rules. Increasingly, they are rebelling because they have learned them, followed them and discovered that the promised reward may never arrive. And when an entire generation begins to suspect that the future has been sold before it was born, the problem is no longer youthful impatience. It is a political and economic system running out of excuses.
No comments:
Post a Comment