History rarely repeats itself cleanly. It prefers echoes, distortions, cheap imitations that feel different enough for the guilty to deny and similar enough for the attentive to feel sick. When Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 he did not bother with parliamentary approval. He did not need to. Power once fully concentrated, does not ask for permission, it announces itself. Only afterward did he stand before the Reichstag to deliver his speech, not to seek consent but to stage obedience. The standing ovation that followed was not patriotism; it was surrender. A chamber full of elected representatives applauded a crime already committed, clapping not because they believed, but because they had ceased to matter.
That moment is worth revisiting not as dusty history but as a warning label we keep peeling off modern politics. Authoritarianism does not arrive wearing a swastika on day one. It arrives wearing applause.
The Reichstag applause mattered because it transformed invasion into normality. It laundered violence through procedure. The message was clear, the leader acts alone the institution follows and the public is meant to confuse noise with legitimacy. Once that choreography is established war becomes just another announcement, another press conference, another flag-draped performance.
Fast-forward to the present and the uncomfortable truth is not that history is repeating itself exactly, but that too many democracies have grown fond of the same theater. The danger is not only in what a leader threatens to do but in how quickly an entire political party trains itself to applaud first and think later, if at all.
When a modern leader speaks openly about military action, regime change, or “necessary force,” the critical question is not whether Congress or Parliament was consulted beforehand. The real question is whether those institutions still understand their role as brakes rather than backing vocals. Applause after the fact is not unity; it is abdication.
In Nazi Germany, the Reichstag had already been hollowed out. Elections existed, but consequence did not. By the time Poland was invaded, the parliament’s role was purely decorative. The standing ovation was the sound of furniture applauding the arsonist who set the house on fire. No resistance, no dissent, no spine, just synchronized clapping and relieved faces hoping compliance would buy survival.
That psychology is not extinct. It thrives wherever political careers depend more on loyalty to a leader than loyalty to a constitution.
The most dangerous myth in modern democracies is the idea that “it can’t happen here” because institutions exist. Institutions do not defend themselves. They are defended or betrayed by the people occupying them. A Congress that applauds reckless threats, illegal actions, or openly authoritarian rhetoric is not a safeguard. It is a corridor with padded walls, designed to muffle the screams of accountability.
And let’s be brutally honest: when elected officials leap to their feet in rehearsed unity after a leader floats the idea of war, invasion or domination without debate, without scrutiny, without constitutional process —they are not protecting national security. They are protecting their seats. Fear of the base, fear of the party machine, fear of being labeled disloyal has replaced fear of history’s judgment. This is how democracies rot from the inside without a single tank rolling down the main boulevard.
Hitler did not need the Reichstag’s approval before invading Poland, and he did not need it afterward either. What he needed was the image: the illusion that the nation, through its representatives, stood as one. Applause was the final cosmetic step in turning aggression into destiny. Once lawmakers clap for the aftermath, they signal they will tolerate the next step too. That is why applause matters more than votes.
Today, when politicians treat warlike rhetoric as campaign fuel and foreign nations as chessboard props, the real line of defense is not the executive branch, it is the legislature. And when that legislature behaves like a fan club, the countdown has already begun. Not necessarily to immediate war, but to the normalization of unilateral power.
World wars do not start because one man wakes up evil. They start because dozens, then hundreds, decide that stopping him is politically inconvenient.
The only people who can realistically stop a reckless executive from dragging a nation—and possibly the world into catastrophic conflict are not pundits, not social media activists, not even voters in the short term. It is the elected representatives who still have legal authority and constitutional obligation to say no. When they fail, history does not ask whether they agreed. It asks whether they resisted.
Silence is collaboration. Applause is endorsement.
The Reichstag’s standing ovation did not protect Germany. It condemned it. It did not preserve order; it accelerated destruction. And every modern parliament or congress that mistakes unity for obedience is flirting with the same damnation. The faces change. The slogans change. The flags change. The mechanism does not.
If legislators want to be remembered as something other than background extras in a tragedy, they must rediscover the radical courage of dissent. Booing is not treason. Questioning is not weakness. Blocking an unjustified march toward war is not sabotage, it is the job.
Because once the applause starts, the bombs are only a matter of time.
Check Thanos Kalamidas' eBOOK, HERE!
No comments:
Post a Comment