Minutes. That’s all it took. Not hours, not days, minutes after President Trump’s announcement of a U.S. attack on Venezuela and the arrest of Maduro, social media was already choking on heroism. Not the inconvenient, muddy, blood-stained kind, but the clean, cinematic, algorithm-approved heroism generated by AI prompts and propaganda farms. American soldiers rescuing children, saluting flags against perfectly orange sunsets, shaking hands with grateful Venezuelans who looked suspiciously like stock-photo models with a tan filter. A war, unfolding live on television, wrapped instantly in a thick digital cocoon of manufactured glory. This wasn’t reporting. This wasn’t even spin in the old-fashioned sense. It was narrative occupation.
Before facts could breathe, before consequences could even be named, the story had already been dictated. And not dictated by journalists, observers or ...God forbid, Venezuelans themselves but by a coordinated storm of fake videos, recycled footage, AI-generated monologues, and heroic mini-epics designed to anesthetize doubt. War, now available in vertical format. Crime, unveiled live, immediately smothered by a comforting lie. This is the new doctrine: strike first, narrate faster.
We no longer wait for investigations or international law to limp onto the stage. We flood the feeds. We overwhelm the senses. We drown scepticism in emotional noise. The modern battlefield isn’t Caracas or Maracaibo, it’s the timeline. And the first casualty is not truth. Truth doesn’t even get the honour of dying. It simply never gets uploaded.
What we witnessed wasn’t spontaneous patriotism. Spontaneity doesn’t come with identical camera angles, synchronized emotional beats, and AI voiceovers that all sound like they were trained on the same motivational podcast host. This was industrial-scale mythmaking. A propaganda net so dense that by the time anyone asked, “Is this legal?” or “Is this real?” the answer had already been buried under five million likes and a flag emoji. And here’s the most obscene part, it works.
It works because it flatters the viewer. It casts them as part of the righteous crowd, the informed majority, the side of history that doesn’t need to think too hard. You don’t have to analyze geopolitics, sanctions, sovereignty, or international law. You just have to feel proud. Feel moved. Feel reassured that the people dropping bombs are also, somehow, moral philosophers with perfect teeth.
AI is the perfect weapon for this age because it doesn’t argue, it asserts. It doesn’t persuade, it replaces. Why debate whether an arrest is legitimate when you can show a deepfake video of grateful citizens cheering? Why explain civilian casualties when you can generate a slow-motion clip of a soldier giving water to a child? Emotion is faster than reason, and algorithms reward speed, not accuracy. This is not just about Venezuela. Venezuela is the stage, not the script.
What’s being tested again is whether reality itself is still necessary. Do we still need evidence when we have vibes? Do we still need journalism when we have content? The answer, from Silicon Valley to the Pentagon press room, appears to be no. Narrative control has become a military objective, and AI is the cruise missile.
Let’s be clear: when a superpower announces an attack and an arrest, and within minutes the digital world is flooded with heroic fiction, that is not patriotism. That is preemptive absolution. It is the laundering of violence through storytelling. A crime doesn’t look like a crime if it comes with a swelling soundtrack and a three-act arc.
And let’s also kill the most irritating excuse of all: “People just want hope.” No. People are being trained to want comfort over truth. To prefer a lie that feels good to a fact that feels complicated. This is not hope, it’s sedation. A society lulled into submission by endless reels of moral certainty.
The danger here isn’t that people believe fake videos. The danger is that they stop caring whether something is fake at all. Once authenticity becomes irrelevant, power no longer needs to justify itself. It only needs to entertain.
Meanwhile, Venezuelans, actual Venezuelans, not AI-rendered extras, are reduced to background noise. Their suffering, their resistance, their voices are inconvenient because they don’t fit neatly into a heroic template. Real people are messy. They contradict the script. So they’re edited out.
This is how empire operates in the age of machine learning: not with declarations, but with distractions. Not with arguments, but with aesthetics. Not with truth, but with overwhelming volume.
And the most depressing part? We’ve seen this before. Different country, different president, same formula. The technology has evolved; the arrogance has not. Every generation of power believes it has finally mastered the art of controlling the story. Every generation is wrong—but not before doing immense damage.
What’s new is the speed. The violence of immediacy. There is no pause anymore between action and myth. The lie doesn’t follow the event it arrives alongside it, like a shadow that moves faster than the body that casts it.
If you’re uncomfortable reading this, good. Discomfort is the last refuge of independent thought. The moment you feel nothing, just a warm glow of digital heroism, you’ve already been conquered.
This isn’t about being anti-American or anti-anything. It’s about being anti-bullshit. About recognizing that when war needs AI fan fiction to justify itself, something is deeply rotten. About understanding that democracy cannot survive if reality is optional and propaganda is automated.
A crime unfolding live on TV should horrify us. Instead, it was immediately wrapped in filters, music, and manufactured bravery. That’s not strength. That’s fear; fear that without constant narrative anaesthesia, people might start asking the wrong questions.
And questions, in this system, are the real enemy.
No comments:
Post a Comment