Is there any way to stop young people gathering under Farage’s flag? The instinctive answer from much of the political class is yes, regulate platforms, shame the leaders, dismiss the voters, and wait for the mood to pass. That answer is wrong and it keeps failing for the same reason it always has. You cannot out-argue a feeling by calling it stupid, and you cannot drain a movement by pretending it is a mirage.
Young people are not drifting toward Farage because they are ignorant of history or hypnotised by charisma. They are drifting because politics has become an abstract language that describes a world they do not recognise. Rent eats their income, work feels temporary, institutions feel brittle, and the promise that effort leads somewhere sounds like folklore. When someone names that unease, even crudely, it feels like relief. Farage does not invent the anger; he rents it.
Attempts to “stop” this gathering usually take the form of moral panic. Labels are applied quickly, lines are drawn, and the young are told they are being misled. This satisfies older voters who want reassurance that the problem lies elsewhere, but it does nothing to address the appeal. In fact, it strengthens it. Being told you are dangerous for asking obvious questions is a powerful recruiting tool. Nothing flatters a generation more than being told it terrifies the establishment.
The deeper problem is that mainstream politics has hollowed out its emotional range. It speaks in metrics, targets, and caution, while everyday life is experienced in stress, boredom, and fear of sliding backward. When the centre refuses to speak emotionally, the margins will. Farage offers a story with villains, victims, and a sense of agency. It may be simplistic, but it is legible. Compare that with the managerial fog young people are usually offered, and the choice becomes understandable.
So is there a way to stop it? Not by prohibition, and not by ridicule. Movements like this fade only when something better occupies the same emotional space. That means offering young people a politics that is tangible, confident, and unashamed of moral language. Not slogans, but commitments they can feel, housing that is actually affordable, work that is not a holding pattern, and a future that does not require permanent anxiety.
It also requires honesty about trade-offs. Young voters are less naïve than they are treated. They know resources are finite. What they resent is being patronised with half-truths and process talk. Farage thrives on the sense that everyone else is lying politely. The antidote is not perfect policy; it is visible sincerity, even when answers are uncomfortable.
Crucially, young people need spaces where political identity is not immediately moralised. The rush to brand supporters as immoral or stupid short-circuits conversation and pushes curiosity underground, where it hardens into belief. If you want fewer young people under Farage’s flag, you have to be willing to talk to them before the flag becomes their identity.
There is also a generational arrogance at play. Older Britain often treats youth politics as a phase to be corrected rather than a message to be heard. But every surge toward disruption is a warning flare. It signals that the social contract is fraying. Ignoring the signal does not restore the contract; it just ensures the next flare is brighter.
Farage is not the disease. He is a symptom of a vacuum where meaning should be. If he vanished tomorrow, something else would rush in to occupy the same space. The real question is not how to stop young people gathering under his banner, but why so many feel the need to gather anywhere at all. Until politics offers belonging without bitterness and change without contempt, the flag will keep finding new hands.
That means investing time where institutions usually retreat: colleges, apprenticeships, online spaces, and local communities where politics is lived, not broadcast. It means arguing robustly without sneering, setting boundaries without theatrics, and remembering that persuasion is slower than outrage. Young people do not need to be rescued from their views; they need to be taken seriously within them. Do that consistently, and the attraction of protest politics dulls. Ignore it, and every attempt to suppress it becomes fuel. Democracy is not protected by silencing its loudest discomforts, but by answering them with courage. That is harder work than outrage, but it is the only path that weakens demagogues without weakening the democratic muscle that keeps society alive over time, for everyone everywhere concerned
No comments:
Post a Comment