The western Christmas spirit has died somewhere in the Gaza ruins, not with a bang but with a long, televised whimper. It did not vanish overnight. It suffocated slowly under layers of rationalizations, press briefings, festive discounts, and carefully worded condolences that mean everything and nothing at once. While lights flicker in European squares and shopping malls pipe in carols about peace on earth, a different soundtrack plays in Gaza, drones, collapsing concrete, and the quiet arithmetic of counting the dead.
Christmas, at least in its western civic form, has long stopped being strictly religious. It became a moral season, a ritualized pause where societies pretend to remember compassion, mercy, and the value of innocent life. That pretence now lies buried under rubble. You cannot sing about goodwill to all while explaining, with straight faces, why thousands of children are acceptable collateral. You cannot hang ornaments shaped like stars while excusing the erasure of entire neighbourhoods beneath real ones exploding in the sky.
What is most striking is not the violence itself, which history reminds us is never new, but the emotional choreography around it. Western governments perform grief like a rehearsed play. There is sadness, yes, but never enough to interrupt arms shipments, diplomatic cover or strategic silence. There is concern, always carefully balanced so it does not tip into accountability. The message is clear, some lives are tragic losses and others are unfortunate statistics.
Christmas once symbolized a temporary suspension of cruelty, a ceasefire of the soul. Even during world wars, stories were told of soldiers laying down arms for a night. Today, the idea of a moral pause feels quaint, almost embarrassing. The bombs do not slow for holidays. The algorithms do not rest. Outrage itself is scheduled, optimized, and quickly replaced by the next trending distraction.
In living rooms across the West, families debate whether it is appropriate to bring up Gaza at the dinner table. It is uncomfortable. It ruins the mood. It makes people defensive. And so the conversation is postponed, diluted, or redirected toward safer abstractions. Peace, everyone agrees, is nice. But specifics are messy. Specifics demand choices, and choices demand responsibility.
The modern Christmas aesthetic thrives on selective vision. We curate what we see and what we refuse to see. A nativity scene with a brown-skinned baby is displayed proudly, while real brown-skinned children buried under debris are framed as regrettable but inevitable. The contradiction is so glaring it requires constant noise to drown it out: sales, slogans, patriotic language, and the comforting myth that power, when wielded by us or our allies, is inherently moral.
This is not about one conflict alone. Gaza has simply become the clearest mirror. It reflects a broader collapse of western moral confidence, replaced by transactional ethics. Values are now conditional, activated only when convenient. Human rights are invoked like seasonal decorations, brought out for some crises and packed away for others.
Many will argue that Christmas spirit is personal, not political. That kindness exists in charity drives, donated toys, and warm wishes. But charity without justice is anaesthetic, not healing. Sending aid while endorsing the conditions that make aid eternally necessary is not compassion; it is management of suffering. It allows people to feel good without asking hard questions about why the suffering persists.
The ruins of Gaza are not just physical. They are symbolic wreckage, exposing how hollow western moral rituals have become. When a society can compartmentalize slaughter and celebration so efficiently, something essential has eroded. The carols still play but they echo strangely stripped of meaning, like songs sung in a language no longer understood.
Perhaps the Christmas spirit is not dead forever. But if it is to mean anything beyond nostalgia and consumer comfort, it will require more than candles and hashtags. It will demand the courage to see clearly, to name injustice even when it implicates allies, and to accept that peace on earth is not a decorative phrase. Until then, the lights will shine brightly in the West, and somewhere under the dust and debris, the spirit we claim to cherish will remain unaccounted for.
History will remember not only what was destroyed, but who looked away and why. Future generations may ask how a season devoted to hope coexisted with indifference so disciplined it resembled policy. The answer will not be found in speeches, but in the silence we normalized, rehearsed, and defended together while calling it realism, balance, or unfortunate necessity.
No comments:
Post a Comment