The mask slipped by Jemma Norman

Racism allegations are now swirling around Nigel Farage’s latest political crusade, threatening to derail his bid to become Britain’s next prime minister. But let’s not pretend any of this is new, surprising, or revelatory. Farage has spent decades cultivating an image built on winks, dog whistles, and deniable provocations; he has offered just enough plausible ambiguity to let supporters insist he’s merely “anti-establishment” or “anti-elite.” Yet there comes a point when the mask slips so often that the public must finally acknowledge what has been hiding underneath all along. Farage is, and has always been, a racist demagogue whose politics thrive on division, resentment, and manufactured cultural fault lines. If anything, the current allegations don’t expose a hidden truth, they simply confirm what has been in plain sight.

Farage’s political life has been a long, looping performance of outrage. For years he presented himself as the cheeky outsider railing against the establishment, a man ready to say “what others are too afraid to say.” But when those forbidden words consistently align with xenophobic tropes, anti-immigrant conspiracies, and a thinly veiled nostalgia for an England that never existed, it becomes clear that the controversy is not accidental, it is the core product.

His movement, like all populist movements, relies on projection. Everything they accuse others of elitism, dishonesty, manipulation, is precisely what their own politics depend upon. They shout about “taking back control” while building a political culture that thrives on chaos. They condemn “identity politics,” yet weaponize national, cultural, and racial identity at every turn. They claim to defend “British values,” but those values curiously shrink to exclude anyone who doesn’t fit their narrow definition of who truly belongs.

Brexit, in many ways, was Farage’s masterpiece, the grand stage upon which he elevated dog-whistle rhetoric to a national referendum. The campaign was saturated with imagery that suggested Britain was being overrun: lines of migrants marching toward the border, shadowy figures waiting to take advantage of the country’s generosity, and sweeping predictions of disaster if immigration wasn’t halted. It wasn’t subtle. It wasn’t sophisticated. It was fear politics, pure and simple.

And it worked not because it persuaded a rational electorate with well-grounded economic arguments, but because it tapped into simmering anxieties about identity and belonging. Brexit became, for many, an emotional outlet rather than a policy decision. Farage didn’t create those emotions, but he stoked them, shaped them, and then presented himself as their champion. Brexit became the alibi, the cloak, the convenient national crisis that allowed prejudice to parade as patriotism.

Now, as he positions himself for the highest office in the country, the façade is cracking. Racism allegations are no longer dismissed as the overreactions of critics, they are becoming impossible to separate from the man himself. Farage’s defenders insist these are unfair smears, that he is simply “telling uncomfortable truths.” Yet if those truths always seem to target the same communities, if they always punch down, if they always reinforce the same narrative of cultural threat, then it’s fair to ask whether these are truths at all or just ideological obsessions presented as courage.

The bigger question is not whether Farage holds racist views; his record speaks loudly enough. The question is how Britain, a country that prides itself on tolerance, finds itself repeatedly flirting with leaders who thrive on intolerance. There is a cultural weariness, a sense of political exhaustion, that populists expertly exploit. In the face of economic stagnation, public service decline, and international uncertainty, the promise of a simple enemy is tempting. Farage’s genius has always been identifying that enemy and making it feel personal.

But leadership built on resentment can never unify a nation. It can only divide it further. Farage’s vision of Britain, exclusive, insular, suspicious of outsiders is fundamentally at odds with the realities of a modern, interconnected society. Britain cannot wall itself off from the world. It cannot return to an imagined past. It cannot build a thriving future by scapegoating minorities for institutional failures.

The current allegations should serve as a turning point. They should force Britain to confront not just Farage’s record but the deeper rot within its political conversation. When racism becomes the subtext of a national campaign, it corrodes the entire democratic process. When populist leaders normalize inflammatory rhetoric, they drag the political center with them. And when voters accept xenophobia wrapped in the language of “common sense,” they risk losing far more than they think they’re gaining.

In truth, Farage has not changed. He has not evolved. He has not hidden who he is. Britain simply allowed him, for far too long, to masquerade as something less dangerous than he has always been. Now, as he stands closer than ever to real power, the country must confront that reality.

Some masks slip. Others were never really on.


No comments:

Kushner’s shadow diplomacy by Markus Gibbons

Jared Kushner has always moved like a man who believes the world is a deal sheet waiting for his signature, its nations and crises arranged...