
Two federal agents fire and a man on his knees becomes a problem solved, a narrative closed, a silence enforced with the finality of spent brass. The phrase “mafia style execution” arrives naturally, because language when frightened borrows from old crimes to describe new ones. What unsettles is not only the violence, which America knows too well, but the choreography of authority around it,: badges, protocols, rehearsed statements, the promise that everything has already been reviewed by someone important. We are invited to treat the scene as an administrative detail, a footnote in the endless manual of justified force, rather than as a moral rupture that should halt the room, the day.
Pam Bondi, Kristi Noem, Kash Patel, Todd Lyons, and thousands of federal employees orbit this moment like distant planets, names invoked as if proximity were guilt and survival were conspiracy. Perhaps they are innocent of this single act; perhaps they are merely custodians of a culture that allows such acts to be processed as paperwork. That distinction matters in court but in conscience it blurs. Systems do not pull triggers, yet they teach fingers what to do when fear knocks. Responsibility becomes an heirloom, passed down through memos and mission statements, polished until it shines like stainless steel and cuts just as cleanly. The shock is not that nobody resigns but that nobody.
The American imagination once insisted that power be nervous that it clear its throat before speaking, that it carry a hint of shame like a pocket handkerchief. Now power clears rooms instead, and shame is considered a scheduling error. We ask why no one is lawyering up, why corridors are not clogged with the cautious shuffle of defense attorneys. The answer may be simpler than conspiracy: certainty is cheaper than doubt. It requires no billable hours to believe you will never be judged. Immunity, once tasted, dulls the appetite for repentance. It is a narcotic administered in small legal doses, then in speeches, then in the lullaby of institutional applause, hummed until sleep.
An execution, official or otherwise, is not merely a death; it is a statement about who gets to finish a sentence. The kneeling man is grammar, a pause erased. We are told there were circumstances, shadows in the air, intelligence too sensitive for our untidy minds. Fine. But secrecy is the oldest costume of cruelty. It dresses blood as necessity and calls it professionalism. A republic that accepts this costume will soon forget the face beneath it, trading citizens for silhouettes. We will debate policy while the vocabulary of mercy grows dusty, a word stored in a drawer labeled “obsolete,” beside rotary phones and the idea that restraint is strength, not weakness.
There is a superstition in modern governance that order is fragile glass, always a breath away from shattering, and that only violence can keep it intact. This belief flatters itself as realism. It is, in fact, a fairy tale told by adults who have misplaced their courage. The kneeling body becomes a prop, a sacrament in the church of control. Officials speak of “hard choices” the way children speak of monsters, with trembling delight. Yet nothing is harder than patience, and nothing more radical than refusing to turn a person into a lesson. Civilization is measured not by how efficiently it kills, but by how stubbornly it insists on keeping the difficult alive.
If courts ever arrive, they will speak in the dry dialect of procedure, a language that mistakes calm for justice. Until then, we live with the theater of confidence: podiums, flags, the careful folding of hands. The absence of visible fear among those in power is advertised as stability. It may be something closer to anesthesia. A society numbed to the sight of a man dying on his knees will eventually lose the ability to stand. Nerves, like muscles, weaken from disuse. When they finally fail, the collapse will be described as sudden, unforeseeable, an act of history, not of habit. We will call it chaos, though it will feel suspiciously like routine.
The question, then, is not why certain names remain in their offices, but why we have grown comfortable pronouncing their permanence. We confuse endurance with legitimacy, motionlessness with innocence. A badge is only a piece of metal; a nation is a daily decision. If we decide that kneeling men are acceptable punctuation, our sentences will shorten, grow blunt, end abruptly. We will call it security. Future generations may call it something less polite. The distance between those words is measured in courage, an old-fashioned unit we pretend not to stock anymore, though it is the only currency that has ever purchased a little more time, a little more air, a little more life.
No comments:
Post a Comment