The problem with the Greek debate over Ilias Kasidiaris is not that people are too alarmed about him. They are not alarmed enough about the larger political disease his return exposes.
Kasidiaris is dangerous. Golden Dawn was not merely another nationalist party with unpleasant manners; its leadership was convicted as members of a criminal organisation, after years in which political violence, racist intimidation and fascist symbolism became part of its public identity. His return to politics deserves vigilance, not nostalgia.
But there is something intellectually dishonest about treating Kasidiaris as though Greek democracy encounters fascism only when fascism arrives from outside the respectable political establishment.
For years, the Greek political system has demonstrated a remarkable capacity to condemn the far right in public while absorbing, accommodating or rehabilitating parts of its political vocabulary and personnel when convenient. That is the contradiction that should make democrats uncomfortable.
The question is not whether Kasidiaris is worse than every politician who has ever occupied a ministerial office. Such comparisons are ultimately a distraction. The question is why the boundaries of democratic respectability have sometimes been drawn so selectively.
Consider Makis Voridis. His political past is not a secret footnote. Before becoming a senior figure in New Democracy and eventually a government minister, he was a prominent figure in Greece's far-right political milieu. Yet the passage from the political fringe to the centre can apparently be accomplished without the centre being asked to explain very much about the journey.
Thanos Plevris presents a different but equally uncomfortable case. His father, Konstantinos Plevris, became notorious for antisemitic and Nazi-associated writings and politics. Thanos Plevris later distanced himself from those positions and condemned antisemitism. That distinction matters. But so does the extraordinary fact that a political family so deeply entangled with Greece's far-right history could ultimately become part of the governing establishment.
And then there are the recurring allegations and controversies surrounding contacts between mainstream conservative politicians and Golden Dawn figures. They have been claims that Dora Bakoyannis secretly negotiated with Kasidiaris over political cooperation when Golden Down was still ‘legal’ and in Parliament; and following Tsipras return and fear, who knows if some in the governing party haven’t thought that time has …arrived again. The point is that the broader history of contacts between establishment politics and the far right is hardly imaginary.
This is where the argument should become uncomfortable. A democracy cannot protect itself merely by pointing at the most obvious fascists and declaring them uniquely toxic. Fascism becomes politically durable when respectable institutions teach citizens that extremism is monstrous in one setting but negotiable in another.
Golden Dawn did not become powerful because Greeks suddenly forgot what fascism was. It became powerful because economic collapse, political rage, immigration fears, institutional distrust and social desperation created an audience for authoritarian politics. Mainstream parties did not create all those conditions but they operated inside them and sometimes competed for the same anxieties.
Kasidiaris understands this. His political opportunity is not created simply by his prison release. It is created by a country in which the far right can repeatedly reinvent itself while the political establishment argues about where, precisely, the line should be drawn constantly moving the red lines..
That is why the comparison that matters is not Kasidiaris versus Voridis, or Kasidiaris versus Plevris. The comparison is between what Greek democracy says fascism is and what Greek politics has sometimes been willing to tolerate from people who came dangerously close to it.
There should be no confusion here: none of this diminishes Kasidiaris's record or the danger posed by a political movement built around authoritarian nationalism and the mythology of Golden Dawn.
It makes the warning larger. The real democratic failure would be to condemn Kasidiaris and then congratulate ourselves while preserving the habits that made his political world normalized and possible. Fascism does not become less dangerous because someone puts on a suit. Sometimes, that is precisely when democracy should pay closer attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment