The tragedy of the current USA-Canadian tariff war is that one side still appears to believe this is a negotiation between governments, while the other increasingly behaves as though it is a personal contest of wills.
Mark Carney, for all his political limitations, understands the distinction. Donald Trump seems determined to erase it.
Carney has approached the confrontation like a man trying to stop a car from crashing into a wall. He has negotiated, offered compromises, sought exemptions and repeatedly insisted that Canada wants a workable relationship with its largest trading partner. Yet he has also drawn a line around Canadian sovereignty, refusing to accept a deal that requires Canada to behave like a subordinate rather than a sovereign country. The latest collapse of negotiations has left Canada preparing retaliation as Washington threatens still higher tariffs.
That is what makes this dispute so revealing. Trump does not seem particularly interested in the traditional language of diplomacy, where two countries bargain, compromise and occasionally discover that neither gets everything it wants. He appears to regard disagreement itself as an insult. A government that says no is not merely negotiating badly; in the Trumpian universe, it is being disobedient.
And Canada has committed the unforgivable offence of refusing to bend the knee. There is something deeply personal about Trump's approach to international trade. Tariffs are presented not simply as economic instruments but as weapons of humiliation. Countries must demonstrate submission. Leaders must praise him. Negotiators must concede. Allies must prove their loyalty by accepting whatever Washington demands.
That is not statecraft. It is transactional narcissism with a flag attached. Calling Trump “seriously sick” is tempting, but it is also beside the point unless one is speaking metaphorically about his political pathology. The more useful observation is that his governing style is extraordinarily dependent on personal dominance, grievance and the appearance of victory. He needs opponents to retreat because retreat validates his power. When they refuse, escalation becomes the answer.
That makes him dangerous not necessarily because he is irrational, but because his version of rationality is so narrowly centred on himself. A tariff that damages USA consumers can still be politically useful if Trump can portray it as punishment inflicted on a foreign government. A trade concession that would benefit both countries can become unacceptable if accepting it does not allow him to claim victory. The economics become secondary to the theatre.
Canada therefore faces an unpleasant reality. Carney can be the adult in the room, but adults cannot conduct a negotiation alone. The United States and Canada are deeply integrated economies. US factories depend on Canadian inputs; Canadian industries depend on US markets. A tariff war is therefore less like two strangers throwing stones at each other and more like two neighbours setting fire to opposite ends of the same house. Analysts are already warning of job losses and recession risks.
The real damage, however, may be larger than the tariff bill. For generations, Canada assumed that whatever disagreements arose with Washington, the basic relationship was secure. That assumption is now disappearing. Canadians are reconsidering American products, US travel and even the psychological comfort of having the United States as an unquestioned partner.
Carney may eventually have to make concessions. Politics is the art of surviving reality, not winning arguments. But there is one concession Canada should never make: accepting that friendship with USA requires obedience to Donald Trump. The adult can keep extending the hand. But eventually, the adult has to stop shaking a fist at a closed door and start building another one.
No comments:
Post a Comment