Germany has spent thirty-six years telling itself a comforting story, reunification healed the wound, democracy absorbed the East and the ghosts of the twentieth century had been safely locked away in the museum of national memory. On Sunday, Saxony-Anhalt offered a rather less comforting interpretation. The Alternative for Germany, the AfD, won 43.8 percent of the vote, more than twice its 2021 result and emerged as the strongest political force in the state. Nationally, it is already Germany’s second-largest party.
This was not an accident. It was the bill arriving at the table. The German political establishment has spent decades treating the far right partly as an electoral nuisance and partly as something that could be domesticated. Immigration could be discussed more harshly. National identity could be wrapped in respectable conservative language. Cultural anxieties could be acknowledged, sometimes amplified, and then supposedly absorbed by the traditional parties. The calculation was simple: steal enough votes from the extremists and the extremists will eventually disappear.
Instead, the extremists learned to steal the language. The tragedy is not that Germany suddenly discovered an appetite for authoritarian nationalism in 2026. The tragedy is that much of the political class repeatedly underestimated how deeply resentment, humiliation and regional alienation could become political capital. Eastern Germany entered reunification not simply as a geographical territory but as a society undergoing an extraordinary psychological and economic shock. Factories vanished. Communities shrank. Careers disappeared. Institutions were replaced. People who had spent decades being told that their country was the wrong Germany suddenly found themselves being told that their experience was largely the wrong history.
That does not make eastern Germans fascists. Nor does poverty automatically produce extremism. But political abandonment creates an empty room and somebody eventually walks into it. The AfD did.
It understood something the respectable parties often did not: people do not vote only with spreadsheets. They vote with memories, grievances, fears, pride and the intoxicating sensation of finally being noticed. The party has been particularly effective at converting legitimate frustrations, about stagnant regions, declining services, immigration, housing, bureaucracy and political incompetence, into a larger story about national betrayal.
That is where the danger lies. A democracy does not become illiberal merely because angry people vote. It becomes vulnerable when legitimate anger is deliberately attached to ethnic hierarchy, historical revisionism, hostility toward minorities and contempt for democratic restraints. The AfD has repeatedly moved in that direction, while its opponents have sometimes behaved as though the principal problem were the party's public-relations strategy rather than its political substance.
And there is an uncomfortable irony here. Every time mainstream parties imitate the far right in the hope of making it unnecessary, they validate the far right's diagnosis. If immigration is suddenly treated as the explanation for every social failure, voters naturally wonder why they should choose the copy rather than the original.
The firewall, meanwhile, is becoming less like a fortress and more like a political Maginot Line: impressive in principle, increasingly awkward in practice. You can refuse to cooperate with the AfD. You cannot refuse to acknowledge that millions of voters have chosen it.
Saxony-Anhalt therefore matters far beyond Saxony-Anhalt. The AfD fell three seats short of an outright parliamentary majority, but the psychological threshold has already been crossed. A far-right party has demonstrated that it can dominate an election in modern Germany without hiding what it is.
That should frighten Europe, not because Germany is about to become Nazi Germany again, but because history almost never repeats itself with the courtesy of wearing the same uniform.
The real lesson of reunification is therefore not that Germany defeated its past. It is that democracy cannot permanently outsource its unfinished business to elections. The ghost was never gone. Germany simply stopped looking under the bed.
No comments:
Post a Comment