Every Israeli-Palestinian generation discovers the same injustice, gives it a new vocabulary, appoints another committee to discuss it and then watches the facts on the ground become harder to reverse. Meanwhile, the occupation continues its patient work. It does not need dramatic speeches. It needs only time.
That is why Ed Miliband’s willingness to act against extremist settler violence matters. Not because sanctions or diplomatic pressure will suddenly produce peace, but because refusing to confront the machinery of permanent occupation is itself a political decision. Silence is not neutrality when one side possesses overwhelming military, legal and administrative power and the other watches its land disappear beneath roads, fences, outposts and settlements.
The disturbing development is not merely that settler violence has increased. It is that the distinction between the violence of individuals and the policy environment that enables it has become increasingly difficult to maintain. When ministers speak openly about removing Palestinians from territory they claim, when settlement expansion is treated as routine government business, and when proposals such as the E1 development move forward despite their implications for the territorial continuity of a future Palestinian state, the question ceases to be simply one of policing extremists.
It becomes a question of state policy. Israel's supporters in Europe and North America have spent decades insisting that criticism of Israeli governments must not become hostility towards Israel itself. That distinction is not merely legitimate; it is essential. But it works both ways. Defending Israel's existence does not require defending every action of an Israeli government. Supporting Israeli security does not require accepting permanent Palestinian dispossession. And opposing anti-Semitism does not mean closing one's eyes when Palestinians are subjected to abuses that would provoke outrage elsewhere.
Indeed, those who genuinely care about Israel's long-term security should be among the loudest voices demanding an end to settlement expansion and settler impunity. A country cannot bomb its way out of a political problem created by denying another people a credible political future. Security without justice becomes an endless security operation, and an endless security operation eventually becomes the political system itself.
The two-state solution has been declared dead so many times that one begins to suspect it has developed the stubbornness of a cockroach. Yet its disappearance would represent something much more serious than the failure of another diplomatic formula. It would mean accepting a political reality in which millions of Palestinians remain permanently subordinated without sovereignty, while Israel continues to control the territory between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River.
That is not a solution. It is a permanent conflict with better public relations. Israel's allies therefore face an uncomfortable choice. They can continue treating settlement expansion as an unfortunate disagreement between friends, issuing carefully worded statements while facts are manufactured on the ground. Or they can finally acknowledge that friendship sometimes requires saying no.
This is where Miliband's position deserves support. International pressure should not be understood as punishment for Israel but as an attempt to prevent an irreversible political disaster. If the occupation becomes permanent, the two-state idea will eventually cease to be a diplomatic objective and become a historical obituary.
And there is an even darker irony. Every settlement that makes a Palestinian state less viable is often presented as strengthening Israel. In reality, it may be strengthening the very forces that make Israel's future more dangerous: permanent confrontation, radicalisation, international isolation and the gradual destruction of the possibility of compromise.
The tragedy is that none of this is inevitable. Israel still has the capacity to choose a different direction. Its allies still possess leverage. Palestinians still deserve political freedom, security and dignity. Israelis deserve the same. The essential question is whether politics can still interrupt the geography being constructed around them.
Because once the map becomes permanent, diplomacy becomes archaeology. And by then, everyone will discover that the two-state solution was not killed in a single dramatic moment. It was buried one settlement, one eviction and one act of impunity at a time.
No comments:
Post a Comment