The unholy alliance that fuels hate and division by John Kato

The election of Donald Trump to the presidency marked a significant turning point in American politics, not only in terms of policy but also in the deepening ties between political power and religious extremism. Among Trump’s most fervent supporters were the radical factions of the evangelical megachurch movement, TV evangelists, and self-appointed religious celebrities who saw in him an opportunity to expand their influence. In return for their unwavering loyalty, Trump handed them an unchecked platform to spread their divisive rhetoric, targeting not only Muslim communities but also turning their ire towards the Catholic Church and even Pope Francis himself.

Trump, a man whose personal life and values hardly align with traditional Christian teachings, managed to cultivate an ironclad bond with evangelical leaders who saw him as a vehicle for their political and social ambitions. Figures like Jerry Falwell Jr., Franklin Graham, and Paula White became key mouthpieces for the Trump campaign and presidency, painting him as a divinely appointed leader. In return, Trump rewarded them with policy decisions that further entrenched their influence, from restricting reproductive rights to appointing conservative judges who would cater to their agenda.

However, this alliance came at a steep cost to social unity. Evangelical leaders, once confined to religious spaces, were suddenly elevated to political kingmakers, emboldened to voice their most extreme views without fear of consequence. They channeled Trump’s own brand of fear-mongering and grievance politics, using their pulpits and television platforms to attack immigrants, LGBTQ+ communities, and religious minorities.

One of the first targets of this emboldened evangelical faction was the Muslim community. Trump’s infamous “Muslim ban” was not just a policy choice; it was a signal to evangelical extremists that their Islamophobic views had a home in the White House. With Trump’s backing, figures like Robert Jeffress, a megachurch pastor and Fox News regular, were free to peddle fear-laced narratives that painted Muslims as existential threats to American Christianity.

However, this campaign of religious division did not stop there. Emboldened by their newfound power, certain evangelical leaders turned their attacks towards the Catholic Church, with Pope Francis emerging as a particular point of contention. His progressive stances on climate change, economic justice, and immigration clashed with the far-right evangelical vision of an America defined by nationalism and corporate capitalism. In response, these evangelicals launched an unrelenting smear campaign against the Pope, branding him a globalist, a socialist, and even the “False Prophet” from the Book of Revelation.

Despite wielding immense political power, Trump-aligned evangelicals positioned themselves as victims in a supposed war on Christianity. This manufactured persecution complex served two purposes: it kept their followers in a constant state of fear and vigilance, and it justified increasingly aggressive rhetoric against other religious groups. Catholic social justice initiatives were framed as threats to American sovereignty, while interfaith dialogue was dismissed as a pathway to moral compromise.

Ironically, these same evangelical figures who accused Pope Francis of undermining Christianity were the very ones who turned a blind eye to Trump’s moral transgressions. His history of infidelity, his inflammatory rhetoric, and his disregard for the poor were all excused in the name of political expediency. In doing so, these evangelicals revealed that their allegiance was not to the teachings of Christ, but to a form of Christianity that served their own pursuit of power.

The unholy alliance between Trump and radical evangelicals has left a lasting impact on American society. It has deepened religious and political divides, fostered a culture of intolerance, and tainted Christianity with the stench of political opportunism. The damage extends beyond partisan politics; it has eroded trust between religious communities and contributed to an environment where hate speech is not only tolerated but celebrated.

The danger of allowing religious extremism to dictate political discourse cannot be overstated. When faith is weaponized for power, it ceases to be a force for compassion and becomes a tool for division and USA becomes ...Iran.


No comments:

From Hegemony to Harmony: A Roadmap for Bangladesh–India Relations Post-Hasina by Habib Siddiqui

The fall of Sheikh Hasina in August 2024 reset Bangladesh’s domestic politics—and unsettled its most consequential external relationship: I...