There is a familiar smell whenever power feels threatened: not accountability, but smoke. Thick, intentional, disorienting smoke. The renewed noise around the Epstein files has that scent again and at the center of it sits Donald Trump not necessarily because of what is known but because of what must be avoided at all costs, sustained attention on his proximity, his past, and his pattern of surviving scandals by detonating larger distractions.
When danger approaches Trump, it rarely meets him head-on. It is rerouted. Deflected. Outsourced. And this time, the tactic appears brutally simple: bury his presence by overwhelming the public with other, louder names.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Bill Clinton are convenient sacrifices. They are known quantities in the Epstein story, already stained in public imagination, already half-convicted in the court of opinion. Dragging them back into the spotlight costs nothing politically. In fact, it helps. Their names are headline-friendly, internationally recognizable, and emotionally loaded. They trigger outrage without requiring new evidence. They keep the story moving just not forward.
This is not about justice. It is about narrative control. Trump’s political machinery does not need to prove innocence; it only needs confusion. And confusion thrives when culpability is spread so thin that it dissolves into spectacle. If everyone is guilty, no one is accountable. If the room is on fire, no one notices who lit the match. What’s more revealing is not who is being named loudly, but who is being handled quietly.
Michael Jackson and Bill Gates hover in the background like shadows, never fully accused, never fully defended. Their names are released not as declarations but as whispers. Dark rumors. Suggestive hints. Enough to poison the air, not enough to demand follow-up. This is strategic ambiguity; deploy the implication without accepting the burden of proof. Let conspiracy-minded audiences do the work for you.
Jackson, long dead and endlessly controversial, is the perfect ghost. Gates, powerful and polarizing, is the perfect distraction. Neither needs to be proven anything; their presence alone widens the fog. And fog is the ally of the guilty.
This is how power protects itself: not by denying facts, but by flooding the conversation until facts drown.
Trump’s lackeys, media surrogates, political influencers, outrage entrepreneurs, understand this instinctively. They don’t argue details. They don’t clarify timelines. They don’t ask who did what, when, and with whom. They ask instead: “What about him?” “What about her?” “Why aren’t we talking about this name?” It is rhetorical arson disguised as curiosity.
And the public, exhausted and cynical, often plays along. There is something deeply unsettling about the ease with which reputations can be burned to keep one man insulated. Andrew and Clinton may not be innocent figures, but they are useful ones. Their involvement, real, alleged, or adjacent, functions as ballast, weighing down scrutiny before it drifts too close to Trump. The irony is that Trump once openly socialized with Epstein, joked about him, praised his taste for “younger” women. These are not hidden facts. They are archived quotes. Yet they rarely anchor the conversation. Why? Because the noise is engineered to ensure they don’t.
This is not a coordinated conspiracy in the cinematic sense. It’s worse. It’s a reflex. A culture of power that knows how to survive by feeding on chaos. Trump thrives in this environment because he understands something fundamental, scandal is not fatal. Focus is.
As long as attention is scattered, across princes, presidents, pop stars, billionaires, Trump remains just another name in a long list, rather than the subject of sustained examination. He doesn’t need to be erased. He just needs to be blended.
And that blending comes at a cost. Not just to truth, but to victims. Every time the narrative shifts from accountability to spectacle, survivors become props in someone else’s damage control strategy. Their suffering is flattened into talking points, weaponized and discarded.
In the end, the Epstein files are not just about who appears in them. They are about who benefits from how they are discussed. And right now, the loudest fires are being set precisely so one shadow can remain comfortably intact.
Smoke is not innocence. It’s evidence of fear.
No comments:
Post a Comment