January 12, Jack London’s birthday is an awkward date to celebrate in polite company. London is one of those American writers who refuses to stay embalmed in the amber of high school syllabi. He keeps pacing, growling, shedding. Read him closely and he has the unnerving habit of sounding contemporary, even predictive. In the era of Donald Trump, London’s work reads less like historical adventure fiction and more like an x-ray of American instincts we prefer not to examine for too long.
London was intoxicated by strength, competition, and survival, but he was also deeply suspicious of systems that rewarded cruelty while calling it virtue. That tension animates nearly everything he wrote. He believed in struggle, yet he never romanticized what struggle did to the human soul. In that sense, London feels like an unofficial chronicler of a nation forever torn between rugged individualism and collective responsibility, a conflict that Trump did not invent but dramatized with reality-television flair.
Take The Call of the Wild. Buck’s transformation is often misread as a simple endorsement of brute force. But London’s point is subtler and darker. Buck survives by adapting to a world that has become harsher, less moral, and ruled by whoever holds the club. Civilization collapses quickly; instincts rush in to fill the vacuum. The lesson is not that savagery is noble, but that it is contagious. Trump-era politics thrived on a similar logic. Norms were dismissed as weakness, empathy reframed as naïveté, and cruelty marketed as honesty. Buck does not become a wolf because it is good; he becomes one because the world demands it.
London understood that power is rarely gentle when it feels threatened. In The Iron Heel, his chillingly prescient dystopia, an oligarchic elite crushes democracy under the pretense of order and patriotism. The book is often cited as a socialist tract, but it is also a psychological study of authoritarianism. The ruling class does not see itself as villainous. It believes it is saving the nation from chaos, decadence, and ungrateful masses. Replace London’s steel trusts with billionaire donors and algorithm-driven outrage, and the structure feels uncomfortably familiar. Trump did not dismantle American democracy; he stress-tested it by amplifying the impulses London warned about: resentment, fear of decline, and nostalgia weaponized into policy.
London was fascinated by masculinity in crisis. His heroes are rarely calm; they are anxious, overcompensating, forever proving something to an invisible jury. This is where the Trump parallel sharpens. Trump’s political persona would have made perfect sense to London. Not admirable, necessarily, but legible. London knew that when men feel their status slipping, they often reach not for solidarity but for spectacle. They demand applause, enemies, and simple hierarchies. Complexity feels like betrayal.
What makes London especially relevant now is that he never let readers off the hook. His stories do not allow moral spectatorship. You are implicated. You root for Buck even as he becomes more dangerous. You understand the Iron Heel’s appeal even as it horrifies you. This mirrors the Trump era’s most unsettling truth: it was not an alien invasion. It was a homegrown phenomenon sustained by millions who found comfort, entertainment, or validation in its excesses. London would not have been surprised. He believed societies revert under pressure, and America, for all its progress, is not exempt from gravity.
Yet London was not a nihilist. Beneath the ice and blood, there is a moral argument pulsing through his work. He believed in solidarity as a counterforce to domination. His socialism was less about doctrine than about dignity, the idea that survival should not require the abandonment of humanity. In the Trump years, this idea was mocked as weakness. But London would argue that a society organized entirely around winners and losers eventually runs out of winners. The wolves eat each other.
Reading Jack London today is not an exercise in nostalgia; it is a warning disguised as a birthday celebration. He reminds us that America’s greatest danger is not decline but denial, the refusal to see how quickly ideals erode when fear takes the wheel. London knew the wolf at the door was never just outside. It was always pacing inside us, waiting for permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment